🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's parliament members have voted to pull out from an global treaty designed to safeguard females from violence, including family violence, following prolonged and heated debates in the parliament.

Thousands of demonstrators gathered in Riga this week to oppose the vote. The final authority now lies with President the nation's president, who must determine whether to endorse or veto the proposed law.

Referred to as the Istanbul Convention, the 2011 agreement only took effect in the Baltic state last year, mandating authorities to develop legal frameworks and support services to end all types of abuse.

Latvia has become the initial European Union member to initiate the procedure of withdrawing from the convention. Turkey pulled out in 2021, a decision that rights groups characterized as a major setback for gender equality.

Political Debate and Resistance

The international agreement was ratified by the EU in last year, yet traditionalist factions have contended that its emphasis on gender equality undermines family values and advances what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a thirteen-hour debate in the Latvian parliament, MPs voted by a margin of 56-32 to exit from the treaty, a action sponsored by opposition parties but backed by politicians from one of the three governing partners.

The outcome represents a defeat for moderate conservative Prime Minister the nation's PM, who joined protesters outside parliament earlier this seven-day period. "We refuse to give up, we will continue fighting so that violence will not prevail," she stated to the crowd.

Ideological Disagreements and Responses

One of the main political groups supporting the withdrawal is Latvia First, whose head has called on citizens to select from what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "gender ideology with various gender identities".

Latvia's human rights commissioner Karina Palkova urged the treaty not to be made political, while the group the rights organization asserted it was "not a danger to Latvian values, it was an instrument to achieve them".

The recent vote has provoked broad protest both inside the country and internationally.

Twenty-two thousand people have endorsed a national appeal calling for the treaty to be preserved. The women's rights organization the rights center has called a demonstration for the coming week, charging MPs of ignoring the wishes of the Latvian people.

Global Worries and Possible Future Actions

The head of the European organization's legislative body stated that the Baltic state had made a rash choice driven by false information. He described it as an "never-before-seen and deeply concerning step backward for female equality and fundamental freedoms in Europe".

He noted that since the transcontinental nation left the treaty four years ago, cases of femicide and violence against women had risen sharply.

Because the vote did not achieve a supermajority support, the head of state could potentially send back the legislation for additional consideration if he holds objections.

Head of State Rinkevics stated on digital platforms that he would assess the vote according to legal requirements, "taking into account state and legal considerations, rather than ideological or political perspectives".

Recently, another member of the ruling coalition, the Progressives, suggested it would not rule out petitioning to the Constitutional Court.

"This decision represents a concerning situation for gender equality not only in our nation but throughout Europe," commented a human rights activist.

• Domestic abuse statistics have been rising in several European countries
• The Istanbul Convention mandates particular legal protections for survivors of domestic abuse
• The nation's decision could influence comparable debates in other EU countries