No Positive Result - Citizens Across the US Express Anxieties About the Government Closure

American lawmakers from each political sides are accusing one another as many of employees are on unpaid leave and the closure drags on with no resolution in prospect.

The Democratic Party have refused to back the GOP funding bill unless expiring healthcare subsidies that they argue many laboring parents count on are extended.

Republicans want Democrats to pass a interim bill beforehand and then they can discuss the support payments.

A Republican Voter, 49, Republican

This Golden State citizen is concerned about the extensive effect of the funding halt on ordinary people.

The GOP have 53 votes, they require 60 to approve the legislation. Could it be that challenging to come together over a handful of votes so that Americans avoid harm?

If this drags on for another week or two, the bottom line is US citizens are being harmed, US residents are being influenced by this and a leader should take action to be the adult in the group.

I believe sometimes legislators are so distant from the people, the average individual managing daily affairs, so they forget what the hardship is like and I feel they should factor that in, particularly if it's 750,000 Americans that are unpaid.

That's a large group of citizens without pay, that's a significant number of citizens not putting their money toward the market. Citizens are just being hurt.

A Democratic Voter, 22, Democrat

This Old Line State citizen acknowledges this closure will bring suffering to many Americans, but she feels it is a necessary political fight.

I'm nervous because there is no favorable conclusion with the government being closed.

I'm highly nervous about what's going to transpire to low-income families, learners who need government grants and government workers.

But this is a worthwhile battle for the Democratic Party to pursue. Naturally employment are going to be cut, initiatives are going to go without funding, which is so unfortunate but I feel that is blood that the Democrats would have on their hands.

I feel it's worth it to hold out, this is sending a strong signal to their supporters.

A Democratic Voter, Thirty-Six, Democratic Supporter

This Golden State citizen is worried the Democratic Party are missing tactics in their closure strategy.

I question if the Senate Democratic leader has a roadmap for an exit strategy to discussions or how to get the group out of this.

I question if the Democratic Party have a clear narrative to the public on what they're pursuing.

In terms of online communication, the Republicans certainly have the advantage. The communication is not persuasive on what Democrats are attempting.

I'm currently at a stage where I'm fairly nervous because funding lapses hurt everyone.

I'm going to be unaffected, but for the rest who relies on the public services, who hopes to go visit a National Park or gallery, they're going to be affected, if not currently, then in the short term.

And that is intolerable.

A Republican Voter, 55, Republican

This Hoosier State voter states Democrats are engaging in partisan games with ordinary Americans and their well-being.

This is typical political maneuvering. It is a temporary funding they are trying to pass, that the opposition don't support.

People are labeling it a leadership-induced halt, it's not on the GOP, it's on the Democratic leader, he's doing it to remain relevant within his political faction - in the meantime, all are in the uncertainty.

I don't see that this is going to resolve.

The average Americans are trapped between sides, and the left are willing to sacrifice those people. They're hurting their cause any advantages when they really hold up issues like this.

Trey Stewart, Twenty-Seven, Democratic Supporter

This Florida resident says Democrats' strategy is a tough but required one and one that affects his sister, who has been placed on leave because of the closure.

The Democratic approach is a difficult one, but sadly it is a required one.

They have failed to do a great deal to impede or prevent the current administration's agenda.

I support their strategy, I endorse their reasoning for taking this action.

The administration leader is a bully and if you acquiesce to a intimidator he's going to demand more, that's how aggressive people operate. So you have to confront a aggressor to make him realise you're not going to give things up for free.

The moment when it becomes too much is when the Democratic Party start losing the PR battle, if the story shifts to blaming the Democrats then it might be necessary to call it quits.

Rom Solene, Sixty-Four, GOP Supporter

This Arizona voter is insulated by the funding lapse so he is accepting of the halt lasting a while, if that is what it takes for the GOP to prevail.

I would think after the period that the Democrats have had, I would have thought that they would have supported the stopgap measure, at least in the short term.

I am all for what the GOP are attempting, I'm all for lowering government spending.

The Democrats have become so opposed of the administration, whatever he offers I think they would find cause to battle him.

I myself am unaffected by the immediacy that many citizens are, this does not affect.

The limited we rely on the public services - what it offers for us - the funding gap is not going to impact us {whatsoever|at all|in any

Amanda Estrada
Amanda Estrada

Marco is an archaeologist and historian specializing in Roman antiquity, with over 15 years of experience in excavating and studying Pompeii's artifacts.